web analytics

Venice Update

News of Venice, CA and Marina del Rey CA

Bridge Home Site Alternatives? LUPC Has Some Suggestions

Land Use and Planning Committee (LUPC)will discuss other sites for the Bridge Housing planned for Venice at their meeting Thursday 6:30 to 9 pm at the Oakwood Recreational Center, 767 California Ave.

Mayor Eric Garcetti had a Town Hall in Venice 17 October to discuss his planned Bridge Housing for the MTA site at Sunset between Main and Pacific Ave.

LUPC has several possible alternatives to the MTA site that they plan to discuss.

VNC to Hear Rose Avenue Apartments, 20 November


Rose Ave apartments will be heard by the Venice Neighborhood Council 20 November and is scheduled for City Planning, 13 December.

They were approved by the VNC Land Use and Planning Committee (LUPC) earlier and the City Planning approved their Tract Map.

LUPC to Meet at Oakwood Thursday, 29 September

Land Use and Planning Committee (LUPC) will meet Thursday, 29 September at 7 pm at Oakwood Recreation Center, 767 California Ave, 90291.

Matt Royce, chair of LUPC, said the agenda will be at Venicenc.org by Monday evening.  Royce also said he plans to have the LUPC meets every first and last Thursday of the month.


Eight Selected to Serve on LUPC


Candidates for the Venice Neighborhood Council Land Use and Planning Committee stand waiting for their one-minute in front of the microphone to explain why they want to serve on the LUPC.  The board then voted for eight of the 13 who applied.  Those who were selected to serve the two years are:

Brian Silveira
Daffodil Tyminski
Joe Clark
Mehrnoosh Mojallali
Michael Jensen
Ramsey Daham
Robert Aronson
Tim Bonefeld

LUPC To Meet Monday, Vera Davis

Land Use and Planning Committee (LUPC) will meet Monday, 6:45 to 10:45 pm, at Vera Davis Center, 610 Electric.

Updates will be given on status of small-lot subdivision and short-term rentals.

VNC De Minimis cases
638 Sunset
314 – 326 Lincoln Blvd
1698 Electric

Review of Active Cases
52 – 54 Wndward
1704 – 1708 Lincoln Blvd
2003 Linden
519 – 521 Boccaccio
2100 – 2106 Narcissus
514 Santa Clara
20 Sunset
15 Westwind
15 Rose

Cases Not Being Heard
658 Venice Blvd
934 Amoroso
230 San Juan
115 Park Place

Rudisill, Chair of LUPC Says No Loss of Property Rights

By Robin Rudisill

I am pleased to announce that: The Sky is NOT Falling.
(a personal statement by Robin Rudisill)

That anyone will be losing 50% or any amount of their property rights due to the VNC’s draft report on Mass, Scale and Character is a fallacy.

I am very concerned that the information in the draft report circulated for the purpose of collecting public comments on the VNC ad hoc committee mass, scale and character recommendations is being manipulated and distorted in order to use it to attack candidates in the VNC’s election. It’s shameful that people are fear mongering by misrepresenting this work.

Here are the facts–PLEASE READ THIS:
1. Years of complaints about over development and projects that were far out of scale with their surrounding neighborhoods resulted in the VNC’s establishment of the Mass, Scale & Character Ad Hoc Committee (MSCC) in late 2012.

2. Analysis of mass, scale and character is required by coastal zone laws, including both the Venice Coastal Zone Specific Plan (city ordinance) and our Coastal Commission-certified Venice Land Use Plan (part of the city’s General Plan). The laws require that for a discretionary land use decision (such as a Coastal Development Permit – CDP) both quantitative and qualitative standards must be applied.

Quantitative standards include things such as height, setbacks, density (# of units), and replacement affordable unit requirements, which are “ministerial” requirements, meaning a planner checks a box for “yes” or “no.” But the qualitative standards, which include compatibility of a project with the mass, scale and character of the surrounding area, involve “discretionary” decisions, requiring a degree of judgment by the decision maker. All development in the Venice Coastal Zone requires some degree of discretionary decision-making, but for several years some of these requirements had been ignored, with the reason given being that they were too difficult to administer.

3. After an extensive review of “best practices,” the MSCC has not only clarified the existence, requirement and importance of these qualitative standards, but has also provided clear definitions of mass, scale and character. Equally important, the committee has proposed frameworks for analyzing them, such as templates using floor area ratio (FAR), upper story step backs, proportional upper stories, and various concepts for articulation of facades, all of which are tools to analyze a proposed development’s compatibility of character and scale with the surrounding existing structures/lots, a.k.a. the neighborhood. These are all tools that are widely used by City and Coastal Planners.

4. Qualitative judgments are a very important part of community planning and protection. Neighborhood planning is not rocket science. It is quite normal to have subjective judgments required for purposes of discretionary land use decisions, such as Coastal Development Permits and Specific Plan Project Compliance Permits.

5. However, one of the goals of the MSCC is to address developers’ often-voiced concerns about uncertainty in the process. The ultimate proposal will provide a fact-based, tested framework and greater definition, in order to help guide the City’s qualitative, discretionary decisions regarding compatibility of a project with its surrounding existing neighborhood. This will increase certainty for developers as well as protection for neighbors.

6. The likelihood of an overall FAR of any number being put into law for the Venice Coastal Zone is slim to none. Venice is not a one-size-fits-all community. That’s why compatibility with a project’s existing surroundings is so important. We value the social and architectural diversity of Venice, which in turn drives the diversity of the character of our numerous unique neighborhoods. We want to allow for maximum creative freedom while staying in the overall scale, massing and character of the given neighborhood. So we must keep some flexibility to make judgments, and cannot rely entirely on quantitative rules.

7. The MSCC draft report is a proposal – not a final product – and an invitation for community input. It has been very clear that nothing in the draft is a final recommendation and that everyone in the community will have a chance to comment. Also, it’s not an attempt, as one developer erroneously asserted, to amend the Venice Coastal Zone Specific Plan. It’s not about numbers, it’s about process, framework and tools. Public comment/input has been a mainstay of the MSCC’s process and is integral to formulating the final recommendations to the VNC Board.

8. Once approved by the VNC, the MSCC recommendations can provide guidance in analyzing projects and can be a starting point in the discussion of our Local Coastal Program. For example, the character analysis, using an excel model programmed to provide statistics for the Streetscape based on the attributes of the block, is an excellent and practical quantitative tool to use for making conclusions about the scale, character, massing, and even the landscape of the existing surrounding neighborhood. Having consistent guidance re. “existing surrounding neighborhood” will also be very useful.

9. The moral of the story is that we mustn’t fall prey to the “chicken little syndrome,” a.k.a. fear mongering. This scare tactic, indicating that you must vote for certain candidates in the June 5th VNC election in order to stop the loss of 50% of your property rights, is unfounded in reality. It is pure electioneering at its most counterproductive.

I welcome your specific questions and concerns.
For the love of Venice,
Robin Rudisill, Venice Land Use & Planning Committee Chair (for identification purposes), but speaking as an individual and not on behalf of the Venice Neighborhood Council or its Land Use & Planning Committee

LUPC Will Meet Tuesday, Foursquare

Land Use and Planing Committee will meet Tuesday (31 May) at 6:45 pm, Foursquare Church, 1400 Riviera Ave. Normally, LUPC meets First, fourth, and fifth Mondays but because of Memorial Day.


Proposed Motion from Neighborhood Committee on Sidewalk Requirement for Venice

Update on City Council’s draft Short-Term Rentals Ordinance


1900 Penmar Ave (3 lot small-lot subdivision with 3 new 3-story SFD’s)

720 Angelus Place (demo of SFD & construct new SFD)

514 Santa Clara Ave (demo 2 SFD’s & construct new 3-story SFD)

551 Indiana Ave (2 lot small-lot subdivision with 2 new 3-story SFD’s)

115 Park Place (demo 2 uninhabited units & construct new SFD)

15 Westwind St (remodel & addition of 4-unit apt bldg with request for height adjustment)
(may be continued)

On Cell Towers, Phones, You, Your Kids

By Jim Murez, former member of Venice Neighborhood Council (VNC) and Land Use and Planning Committee (LUPC) and again a VNC Candidate

For several years I headed the Venice Neighborhood Council (VNC) Cell Tower Committee. During this period, I reached out to a friend that does a lot of investigative reporting about the rumors around the harmful effects of Cell Towers on people.

Our City and State government officials want to turn their heads because the FCC says they know better. Now we need to restart the fight and get the placement of towers to consider health factors!


And if you let a child play with your cell phone, switch it to airplane mode. That will turn off the transceiver in the phone thereby making it safe.

LUPC to Meet Monday, 23 May

Land Use and Planning Committee (LUPC) will meet Monday (23 May) at 6:45 pm, Vera Davis Center, 610 California Ave, LA 90291.

Informational presentations/updates
201 Ocean Front Walk (“Israel Levin Center”), update on exterior finish
Venice Place Hotel (fka Abbot Kinney Hotel), update

De Minimis Project Review
2312 Ocean Ave

Unpermitted Development Review
906 Milwood Ave

I. 1704-1708 Lincoln Blvd (“The Lincoln Grocery”–change of use from retail to restaurant, retail and office)
II. 632 Brooks Ave (major remodel of 2-story duplex)
III. 2003 Linden Ave (demo SFD, construct new SFD)
IV. 519-521 Boccaccio Ave (demo duplex, construct industrial building)
V. 2100-2106 Narcissus Court (demo SFD, construct industrial building)
VI. 821 Nowita Place (> 50% demo, remodel & addition to SFD)
VII. 115 Park Place (demo duplex, construct new SFD)
VIII. 1057 Indiana Ave (zoning administrator adjustment for rear yard setback)
IX. 20 Sunset Ave (remodel & 2nd story addition)

Arnold Springer to Publish “History of Venice 1850 to 1939”

Longtime Venice activist and Venice office holder Arnold Springer said he would be releasing his “History of Venice 1850 to 1939” in three or four months. Release date will be forthcoming.

Springer was a history teacher at California State University at Long Beach before retiring from “academics and politics … national, regional and local. At CSULB he taught Russian History, European Intellectual History, Methodology and Philosophy of History, and Local History.

KCET did some filming of his Venice history in segments. One can see them at: https://www.kcet.org/shows/departures/dr-arnold-springer-venice-historian They start with Venice was an Estuary.

“In three our four months I should be ready to publish and release my History
of Venice of America 1850-1939. Right now I am proofreading and will let you know when it is available,” he wrote.

“It will be printed in a limited number of copies and distributed in Venice.
Initially. it will be distributed free to family and selected friends.

“After the initial free distribution has been completed, it will become
available at Small World of Books only in Venice, and the terms or price
there will be set by Mary Goodfader, owner of Small World.

“It will not be available online.

Apparently, Arnold has plans for more than just the initial book.

Book #2:
Materials for the Popular History of Venice
New Venice: Amusements: Vice: Curiosities.

Book #3:
Materials for the Ethnic History of Venice
Asians: Blacks: Native Americans: Mexicans: Jews: Russians.

Book #4:
Materials for the Monographic History of Venice
Art: Agriculture: Aviation: Canals: Politics.

Book #5:
Materials for the Monographic History of Venice
Radicals: Workers: Women: World War One:
Water: Sewers: Oil: Police: Individuals.

Additional Materials:
Abbot Kinney: To be released at a later date.

Arnolds said the manuscripts for the above and any additional materials that are not
published will, in the future, be housed/located at: Venice Collection,
Special Collections, Research Library, California State University Long